Skip to content
Udyat Technologies
Use cases

The specific jobs, not the general pitch

Our service pages argue the general case. These are the particular problems people actually arrive with — a named system, a statutory deadline, a spreadsheet nobody dares touch. Each one says how we approach it, and when it is not worth doing.

10 use cases

Systems and migration

Getting off, onto, or between the systems Indian businesses actually run — Tally, spreadsheets, ageing desktop software, on-premise databases.

Migration

Moving from Tally to a real ERP

Tally is good accounting software being asked to run a whole business. Here is how to stop asking.

Most businesses do not need to leave Tally. They need to stop using it for the things it was never built for, and move those onto something else first.

First process live in 8–12 weeks
Modernization

AI and analytics on the ERP you already have

You do not migrate to an intelligent ERP. You make the one you have intelligent, in a particular order.

Forecasting, anomaly detection, and asking your own data questions in plain language all work now. They work on trustworthy data, and fail quietly on the other kind.

First working model in 8–12 weeks
Integration

Integrating Tally with the rest of your systems

Stop re-typing the same invoice into two systems. Tally can talk to things — badly, but reliably.

Tally's XML and ODBC interfaces are awkward but dependable. Wrapped properly, they let your website, CRM, or operations system exchange data with Tally without anyone re-keying.

Working integration in 3–6 weeks
Migration

Replacing a spreadsheet that has become a system

The spreadsheet everyone depends on and nobody wants to touch. That is not a spreadsheet any more.

When a workbook has become the system of record for a real process, the failure modes stop being inconvenient and start being expensive. Turning it into an application is usually a short project.

Live in 4–8 weeks
Migration

Modernizing FoxPro, VB6 and Access systems

Software written by someone who left years ago, running on a PC nobody is allowed to switch off.

These systems usually encode two decades of business rules that exist nowhere else. The migration risk is not the code — it is losing the rules.

Discovery in 2–3 weeks, first module in 10–14 weeks
Migration

Moving an on-premise database to the cloud

The server in the corner that everything depends on, and that nobody has patched since it was installed.

Moving a production database is routine work done carefully. The difficulty is almost never the copy — it is the applications pointing at it and the cutover window.

Assessment in 1–2 weeks, cutover in one planned window
Implementation

SAP Business One, implemented properly

A capable mid-market ERP that punishes a rushed implementation more than most.

SAP Business One is rarely the problem. What decides the outcome is whether the process was agreed before configuration started, and who owns it afterwards.

Discovery 2–3 weeks, first go-live 12–20 weeks
Implementation

Odoo, and the implementation that decides it

The software is capable. The spread between a good implementation and a bad one is wider than with any comparable system.

Odoo gives you breadth at a low licence cost and will happily let you configure yourself into a corner. Spend the saving on the implementation.

First modules live in 8–14 weeks
Integration

Making the Zoho suite work as one system

Buying the whole suite does not make it joined up. That part is still work.

Zoho apps are individually good and only loosely connected by default. The value is in the flows between them — and in connecting them to what sits outside.

First flows live in 4–8 weeks
Migration

Moving off Busy or Marg

Solid distribution software, usually outgrown in the same three places.

Businesses leave Busy and Marg for multi-location stock, real access control, and anything that has to be reached from outside the office.

Assessment 1–2 weeks, first phase 8–12 weeks
8 use cases

Compliance and regulation

The statutory work that has to be built, not just advised on: GST, e-way bills, data protection, KYC, and export documentation.

Compliance

GST e-invoicing, integrated properly

Generating an IRN should be something your system does, not something a person does on a portal.

E-invoicing is straightforward to comply with badly — by uploading on a portal — and only slightly harder to do properly, as part of the invoice being raised.

Live in 3–5 weeks
Compliance

E-way bill generation without the data entry

The same consignment details, typed a third time, while a loaded truck waits at the gate.

E-way bill data already exists in the invoice. Generating the bill from it — with validity, extension, and part-B updates handled — removes a step that regularly delays dispatch.

Live in 3–4 weeks
Compliance

DPDP Act compliance for software teams

Most of this is engineering work, not policy work — and the engineering is where teams are least prepared.

Consent, retention, deletion, and breach notification are things your systems either do or do not do. A policy document does not implement any of them.

Assessment in 2–3 weeks, remediation phased
Integration

Aadhaar and PAN verification, integrated

Verification that takes seconds instead of days, and stores evidence rather than documents.

Identity verification is a solved problem technically. What determines whether it is done well is what you store afterwards, and what you deliberately do not.

Live in 4–6 weeks
Compliance

Export documentation that generates itself

The same shipment details, retyped across a dozen documents, each with its own format and its own consequences for being wrong.

Export paperwork is largely the same data in many shapes. Generating it from one record removes both the typing and the inconsistencies that hold up shipments.

Live in 6–10 weeks
Integration

Reading and checking documents automatically

Extraction is the easy half. Knowing when the model is unsure is what makes it usable.

Automated document reading works well when it is designed around its own uncertainty — routing what it is not sure about to a person instead of guessing.

Pilot in 6–8 weeks
Compliance

ISO 27001 readiness, without the theatre

A certificate proves you have controls. Building controls worth having is a different project, and it is the one that matters.

Most of ISO 27001 is engineering and process work. The documentation is real but it is the smaller half, and doing it first produces a folder rather than security.

Gap assessment 2–3 weeks, readiness 4–9 months
Compliance

SOC 2 for Indian SaaS companies

The report that unblocks North American enterprise deals, and the engineering it quietly requires.

SOC 2 tests whether your controls operated over a period, not whether they exist today. That distinction changes when you have to start.

Readiness 2–4 months, then a 3–12 month observation window

Not seeing yours?

This list covers what we are asked about most often, not everything we do. If your problem is specific and not here, it is still worth a conversation — the answer may be that you do not need us, and we will say so.

Next step

Start with the assessment

Ten questions about how your business runs today, and a straight read on which of these would pay back first. No email needed to see the result.